When it's on it makes sure that the next most critical path has at least 40% different activities than the previous one.
When it's off it works like this:
When it's on it works like this:
Let's say that you have two paths to the end of the project. The two paths are 500 activities long each, but they are only different for 1 activity. So, you have:
P6 would show you both of those paths as different, but they are not significantly different. In many cases this can just become clutter information that gets in the way. We wanted to give the user the ability to see 5 paths to an activity but those paths to be different in a meaningful way.
Let's show a simple example to better explain this. Picture that we have the following network and we ask the software what are the paths to finish
With N&L grouping off:
If we have N&L grouping turned off the product will act exactly as P6:
In this case though Path 1 and Path 2 are too similar. So let's give it a go with N&L grouping π
With N&L grouping on:
When it comes to Path 3 we have:
Therefore the final resutls will with N&L grouping will be :
The path with the pink activitiy will be ommited as too similar to Path 1.